Why You Need AI Code Validation
AI coding assistants are powerful, but they don't understand your project's architecture.
Real Problems Developers Face
❌ AI violates layer boundaries
Your AI assistant imports database.ts directly into your UI component, bypassing your service layer.
Example:
// src/components/UserProfile.tsx
import { db } from '../../infrastructure/database'; // ❌ VIOLATION
// Should use:
import { UserService } from '../../services/user-service'; // ✅ CORRECT❌ AI duplicates logic across modules
The AI recreates authentication logic in 3 different places instead of using your existing AuthService.
❌ AI modifies protected code
The AI "helpfully" refactors your critical payment processing logic without understanding the implications.
Example:
// src/payments/stripe.ts
// #protected-start
export async function processPayment(amount: number) {
// Critical payment logic - DO NOT MODIFY
// This has been audited and tested
}
// #protected-end❌ AI adds banned dependencies
The AI suggests moment.js when your team has standardized on date-fns.
Why Existing Tools Aren't Enough
- ESLint: Catches syntax and style issues, not architectural violations
- TypeScript: Enforces types, not module boundaries
- Tests: Validate behavior, not structure
- Code Review: Happens too late, after AI has already written the code
Intent Guard validates BEFORE the code reaches your codebase.
The Cost of Architectural Violations
Technical Debt
- Circular dependencies make refactoring impossible
- Tight coupling prevents testing
- Mixed concerns create maintenance nightmares
Security Risks
- UI code accessing database directly bypasses security layers
- Protected authentication logic gets modified
- Secrets leak into wrong modules
Team Productivity
- Code reviews become battles about architecture
- New developers don't understand the "rules"
- AI assistants keep making the same mistakes
How Intent Guard Solves This
1. Preventive Validation
Catches violations before they enter your codebase, not during code review.
2. AI-Native Design
Designed specifically for AI-generated code. The AI can query rules and self-correct.
3. Just-In-Time Context
AI assistants can ask "What can this file import?" before generating code.
npx intent-guard rules-for src/domain/user.ts
# Returns: { "canImportFrom": [], "isProtected": false }4. Self-Correcting Loop
AI generates code → Intent Guard validates → AI sees errors → AI fixes → Repeat until ✅5. Architectural Memory
Tracks your architecture health over time. Detects drift automatically.
# First run
✅ No violations found!
# Later...
🚨 ARCHITECTURAL DRIFT DETECTED
Errors increased from 0 to 3Real-World Impact
Before Intent Guard
- 🔴 AI imports database in React components
- 🔴 Protected payment logic gets refactored
- 🔴 Deprecated packages keep appearing
- 🔴 Architecture rules exist only in documentation
After Intent Guard
- ✅ Layer boundaries enforced automatically
- ✅ Critical code protected from modification
- ✅ Banned dependencies blocked
- ✅ Architecture rules are executable code
Who Benefits Most
Teams Using AI Assistants
If your team uses Cursor, Copilot, or Windsurf, Intent Guard prevents AI from breaking your architecture.
Projects with Clear Architecture
Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, Layered Architecture - Intent Guard enforces your chosen pattern.
Growing Codebases
As your project grows, manual architecture enforcement becomes impossible. Intent Guard scales with you.
Regulated Industries
FinTech, HealthTech, and other regulated industries need to protect critical code. Intent Guard provides automated enforcement.